月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
政大法學評論 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
論海上軍事活動之國際法規範
並列篇名
A Study on International Regulations Concerning the Military Activities at Sea
作者 陳貞如 (Jen-Ru Chen)
中文摘要
關於海上軍事活動之國際法規範,《聯合國海洋法公約》透過相關通行制度之安排,確保軍艦於領海、國際海峽與群島海道之航行,以及軍機於國際海峽與群島海道之飛越,相關軍事活動若不悖離於「和平目的」,仍有存在之空間。公約透過模糊之規範用語,嘗試平衡相關國家之權利和義務,遺留相關法律問題,須透過爭端解決機制加以解決。惟公約締約國可透過聲明,排除爭端解決機制對於其軍事活動之管轄權,使得此一機制未能發揮功能。但近年來,國際爭端解決機制對於相關案件之管轄權認定,漸趨寬鬆,一旦進入實質審理時,爭端解決機制將面對新的挑戰,必須加以克服。
英文摘要
Regarding the international regulations on military activities at Sea, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOS Convention) is applied in the peacetime and establishes both the maritime zones and navigation system. Through the navigation system, the LOS Convention ensures the navigational rights of warships in territorial seas, international straits and archipelagic sea lanes, along with the overflight rights of military aircrafts in international straits and archipelagic sea lanes. As long as the military activities do not deviate from the purpose of peace, there is still room for their existence. While the LOS Convention has adopted ambiguous terms in order to balance both the rights and obligations of maritime States and coastal ones, the relevant legal arguments whose resolutions rely on dispute settlement mechanisms still remain. The contracting parties of the LOS Convention can adopt the declarations to exclude disputes about military activities from the compulsory jurisdictions of the dispute settlement mechanisms. Yet recently such mechanisms tend to accept their own jurisdictions over these case types. Once entered into substantive procedures, such mechanisms will face new challenges that need to be resolved.
起訖頁 83-141
關鍵詞 海洋自由論海洋封閉論聯合國海洋法公約專屬經濟區無害通過過境通行群島海道通過船舶軍艦海上軍事活動Mare LiberumMare ClausumUN Convention on the Law of the SeaExclusively Economic ZoneInnocent PassageTransit PassageArchipelagic Sea Lanes PassageVesselsWarshipsMilitary Activities at Sea
刊名 政大法學評論  
期數 202003 (160期)
出版單位 國立政治大學法律學系
DOI 10.3966/102398202020030160002   複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 自訴存廢的十字路口──規範目的與實證研究的考察路徑
該期刊-下一篇 裁判憲法審查初探
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄