月旦知識庫
 
  1. 熱門:
 
首頁 臺灣期刊   法律   公行政治   醫事相關   財經   社會學   教育   其他 大陸期刊   核心   重要期刊 DOI文章
厦门大学法律评论 本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
  【月旦知識庫】是否收錄該篇全文,敬請【登入】查詢為準。
最新【購點活動】


篇名
修復式正義視野下的附條件不起訴運行效果與完善建議
並列篇名
The Operation Effect and Improvement Suggestion of Conditional Non-Prosecution under the Vision of Restorative Justice
作者 劉作淩
中文摘要

修復主義正義觀注重保護具體法益和恢復社會整體秩序,注重加害人、被害人和社區利益的平衡協調,在輕微犯罪領域逐步踐行,幷成爲現代刑事司法處理犯罪的一種方式。我國2012年刑事訴訟法新增設了附條件不起訴制度,體現了我國對未成年被告人實行教育、感化、挽救相結合的刑事司法方針,推動了修復式正義理論之實踐,通過規定附條件不起訴的適用條件、考驗期限、考察內容以及訴訟各方的程序參與等,使未成年被告人可以通過自己的行爲彌補因犯罪所造成的損害,使被害人要求的物質及精神損失賠償的意願得以實現,以修復被犯罪所破壞的社會關係。實踐過程中附條件不起訴運行效果較好,但還存在不足,應當進一步擴大適用範圍、强化監督考察機制以及保障被害人訴權的實現。

英文摘要
Revisionism view of justice, focusing on the protection of specific legal interests and the restoration of the overall social order, emphasizing the reconciliation of the interests of the injurer, the victim and the community, gradually practiced in the field of minor crimes, and became a feasible way for modern criminal justice. The establishment of conditional non-prosecution system embodies the principle of combining education, persuasion and rescue for the unaccused, and promotes the practice of the theory of reconstructive justice. By setting the conditions for application, the duration of the trial, the contents of the investigation and the participation of the parties to the proceedings, the offender is given the opportunity to make up for the damage caused by the crime through his own actions and the victim’s willingness to seek compensation for his own material and moral losses. To repair the social ties that crime has destroyed. In the course of practice, the system of non-prosecution with conditions works better, but there are still shortcomings. It is necessary to further expand the scope of application, strengthen the supervision and inspection mechanism, and ensure the realization of the victim’s right of complaint.
起訖頁 167-179
關鍵詞 附條件不起訴修復式正義實踐運行保障機制conditional non-prosecutionrestorative justicepractical operationguarantee mechanism
刊名 厦门大学法律评论  
期數 201906 (31期)
出版單位 廈門大學法學院
DOI 10.3966/615471682019060031011   複製DOI
QRCode
該期刊-上一篇 “需要國家干預說”與“縱橫統一說”經濟法學思想考辨——與劉文華教授商榷
該期刊-下一篇 網路涉眾型經濟犯罪的實證分析與應對舉措——以福建省廈門市為例
 

新書閱讀



最新影音


優惠活動




讀者服務專線:+886-2-23756688 傳真:+886-2-23318496
地址:臺北市館前路28 號 7 樓 客服信箱
Copyright © 元照出版 All rights reserved. 版權所有,禁止轉貼節錄