法律東方主義話語中的中國與美國

China and the United States in the discourse of legal Orientalism

解構是審視法律及其表層話語的一項分析方法。本文的切入點在於把《法律東方主義》一書置於法律解構的脈絡中，質疑法律對立的二元特徵。隨後，針對東方主義與法律這一主題之下的諸多早期作品進行簡要的回顧，在增進對非西方法的認識之同時表明東方主義在我們居住的世界仍扮演著重要角色。接著，將檢驗《法律東方主義》提出的關於中國無法性迷思的諸多主張，並考察該書對美國為何向中國爭取治外法權所作的論證。最後，通過考察這部著作中的一個實證面向——美國在華治外法權的實踐，來思考東方主義對法學研究的貢獻及其在法學研究中的未來。

Deconstruction is an analytical method to examine law and its surface discourse. The breakthrough point of this paper is to put the book "legal Orientalism" in the context of legal deconstruction, questioning the two characteristics of legal opposition. Then, a brief review of many early works at the theme of Orientalism and the law, in the promotion of non western law knowledge at the same time that Orientalism still plays an important role in the world we live in. Then, the test "many ideas about Chinese could not myth of legal Orientalism" is proposed, and the effects of the book on why the United States to China for verification of exterritoriality. Finally, through an empirical investigation in this book - oriented practice of American extraterritoriality in China, thinking Orientalism contribution to legal research and legal research in the future.