特種勤務條例第12條第1項及其施行細則相關條文之評析——以警察執行特種勤務行使職權為中心

The Analysis of Special Guard Service Act Section 12 Paragraph 1 and the Relevant Provisions of Its Enforcement Rules: Focusing on Exercising Authority by Police

特種勤務之執行屬國家安全局之職掌，在國內總是披上一層神秘面紗，不易為外人所知。特種勤務指為維持安全維護對象（如總統、副總統與其配偶及一親等直系血親、卸任總統、副總統及其配偶、總統、副總統候選人及其配偶、總統、副總統當選人與其配偶及一親等直系血親、其他經總統核定人員等）之安全為目的，由國家安全局協調、督導、管制特種勤務相關編組機關（構）、單位，對特勤安全維護對象之預謀或意外之危害、滋擾等，所採取之安全維護作為。執行特種勤務之人員多元，包含警職、軍職及文職人員，其中並以警職人員派遣占出勤人數之大宗。2012公布施行之特種勤務條例，為長久以來受質疑執法依據不足之特種勤務提供法律基礎，惟特種勤務條例之通過卻非一切爭議之終止。本文嘗試從法律面及實務面切入，從依法行政角度探討特種勤務條例第12條及其施行細則相關條文合憲性問題，並以自身實務經驗分析特種勤務條例準用警察職權行使法之妥適性，期能引發更多學者專家投入研究。

Special Guard Service is the responsibility of National Security Agency. In our country, it always put a layer of mystery, not easy for outsiders to see through. Special Guard Service refers to ensuring the safety of current and former national leaders (such as the President, past Presidents, Vice Presidents, presidential candidates, etc.) and their families. Personnel to enforce the Special Guard Service is pluralism, including the police officer, military and civil servant. Among the attendant personnel, the dispatch of police officer is majority. The enactment of Special Guard Service Act on january 4th, 2012 provide a legal basis for enforcing the special guard service which is long challenged by public for its lack of law enforcement basis, but the leagal controversy is not ended. This paper attempts from the legal side to analysing of Special Guard Service Act section 12 paragraph 1 and the relevant provisions of its Enforcement Rules; the practiacl side to compare the similar properties of Special Guard Service with Police Power, with hope of helping the development of relevant legal thinking, amendment of regulations, and the general elevation of the legal research of Special Guard Service.