英文摘要 |
Individuals’ thinking and attention, and task difficulty and complexity can be captured by eye movement and tracking, however is it generalizable to individuals’ end performance and difference? The eye tracking experiments are getting popular in studying individual or group differences, but whether seeing differently is equal to moving differently is an interesting question deserving more exploration. The present study incorporated prototype online spatial games, a performance test and a paper-and-pencil test to investigate genders’ spatial differences in eye tracking and test scores. There were 12 female and 18 male subjects with college above education. The results showed that, (1) there was no gender difference in the paper-and-pencil spatial test scores, (2) there was no gender difference of eye tracking in the simple 2D task, (3) there were significant gender differences found in total fixation time, total fixation count, and regression time in the difficult 2D task, and (4) in the 3D performance task, males were found to fixate the rotating object in a wider horizontal range. Although the genders’ eye tracking patterns were not the same, there was no difference in their test scores and completing all the tasks, which showed that seeing differently was not necessarily equal to performing differently. For the Higher-Ed female and male subjects in the study, there were more similarities than differences in their comparisons of spatial thinking and outcome performance; nevertheless the task difficulty was related to the genders’ differential eye tracking. |