對醉駕入刑司法效果的實證研究－－以重慶市A法院相關審判資料及判例為主要樣本

Analysis of the trial validity on the dangerous driving crime

在超大城市基層法院管轄範圍，醉駕刑事案件數量一度僅次於盜竊案件，入罪主要標準是駕車人體內酒精含量達到80mg／100ml；醉駕因交通事故和糾紛而被消極發現的高概率表明仍有大量的犯罪暗數；醉駕入刑雖能約束國家工作人員行為，犯罪人卻大多沒有犯罪感；與公眾報應犯罪訴求不同，緩刑且被重處罰金符合犯罪人的預期；醉駕人多屬家庭及社會經濟的支柱，作為輕罪和法定犯，如何避免因監禁受到犯罪感染，對於一定時期無交通違章和違法行為的，如何消滅前科記錄，都是刑事法機制後續應予解答的問題。

Within the jurisdiction of the primary courts of large urban cities, the number of drunk driving cases now seconds only to theft In fact, drunk driving is always negatively found because of traffic accidents and disputes, which indicates a high probability of a large number of intrinsic dark counts Drunk driving conviction effectively constrain the behavior of public servants, however, the other of drunk drivers dont feel guilty The criterion of courts conviction and sentencing is alcohol concentration, which may accordingly result in penalties It is in line with expectations of the drunk drivers that detention and probation are imposed a fine instead of punishment The drunk drivers are mainly backbones of their family and the whole social economy As a misdemeanor and statutory offense, it is an important issue for criminal law mechanism to response how to avoid infection due to imprisonment and how to destroy their conviction records for a certain period of no traffic violations and illegalities.