臺灣地區鄉鎮市調解與祖國大陸人民調解之比較研究

A Comparison on Mediation Between Region Taiwan and Mainland China

兩岸分治超過一甲子，無論在國家法律層面或民間習慣方面，均有著截然不同的發展，但根植於舊社會的糾紛解決小傳統“調解”，卻不約而同地同時受到兩岸的重視，並有相應的立法和創新，將其推展到整個國家，使之成為當代法制的大傳統，調解具有的功能和價值自是不言而喻。透過行政法的五大架構，深入分析比較臺灣地區的鄉鎮市調解與祖國大陸的人民調解兩種調解制度在基本原理、行政組織、行政權限、行政救濟、行政監督方面之差異，有利於兩岸對彼此調解制度的認識和學習，更期許在兩岸人民往來中，調解也能夠適時地發揮功效，以保障兩岸人民的基本權益。

Taiwan Region  and Mainland China has been separated more than a half of a century. There are totally different developments in State laws and civil customs. However, mediation, which is rooted in traditional society, has been paid attention in dispute solution by both sides, and has its legal making and institutional innovation extending to entire country. It is goes without saying that on function and value that mediation has potential to become as a new paradigm in modern legal system. Through in depth analysis and comparison of the Township mediation in Taiwan Region  and the Peoples mediation in mainland China in terms of five administrative structures as the basic principle, administrative organization, administrative authority, administrative remedies, the administrative supervision, it is useful for each other to understand and learn the mediation system. We hope the mediation can work efficiently to protect the fundamental rights and interests of people of both sides.