英文摘要 |
The difference and comparison of Mencius and Xunzi's theory of human nature has always had many research results, but it is still inconsistent. Perhaps it may be possible to turn from the perspective of ethics and ontology to the theory and method of biology as an inspiration and comparison, and we could re-understand Mencius and Xunzi's theory of human nature. The comparison of doctrine of human nature is good and doctrine of human nature is evil, should no longer to focus on the similarities and differences between the two theories in the future, but should ask and explain why they are different in the contemporary thinking model. The first thing that must be clarified is that school of Xunzi and school of Mencius are different paradigms. We can't use the mainstream ideology of Mencius doctrine in the field of Chinese philosophy to be the standard, and say Xunzi's doctrine is wrong. We couldn't understanding the doctrine of human nature of Xunzi via the paradigm of "moral man” from Doctrine of Mencius. Because Xunzi's theory of human nature is discussed from the perspective of biological existence. Just as Xunzi says, “The different from human being and orangutan not because legs and hairless, but distinguished they by the distinguishing.” Xunzi thinks man and orangutan is the same in biology, what the different from them should distinguishing by the culture and knowing. Therefore, it is necessary to discuss Xunzi's theory of human being via orangutan, and we could understand and reconstruct Xunzi's theory of human being. |