東亞去殖民主義思想的系譜與朴玄埰的民族主義論

The Genealogy of East-Asian Decolonialism and Park Hyun-Chae's Discourse on Nationalism

2017年南韓總統朴槿惠遭彈劾解職，以及因此提前的總統選舉與 政權交替，皆對當代南韓政治社會局勢產生了重大的影響，打造了最 新一波的政治社會轉型。在此期間，《我只是個計程車司機》（2017）和 《1987：黎明到來的那一天》（2017）這兩部電影不只取得了商業性成 功，也對身處歷史當下的我們應該如何重新歷史化20世紀後半期的南 韓，提出值得認真思考的若干重要問題。 本文關注這兩部電影所隱含的「去歷史化」傾向，試圖脈絡化東亞 和第三世界的去殖民主義思想的歷史性，從而重新思索去殖民化中的 主體。因此，本文承擔了一個既陌生又「危險」的課題，即重構東亞 「去殖民主義」的思想史系譜。 通過重新挪用毛澤東（1893-1976）、竹內好（1910-1977）和溝口雄 三（1932-2010）等人所形成的東亞區域的思想史脈絡，本文將南韓思想 家朴玄埰（1934-1995）所提出的「民族主義論」、「民族經濟論」和「社會 性質論」賦予新的定位，並藉由這些思想資源提出新的理論問題，進而 理解並克服21世紀南韓社會所面對的知識思想危機。

The impeachment of President Park Geun-hye and the early presidential election in 2017 that ensued had brought about a profound impact on the political and social situation in South Korea. Situated at this conjuncture, the movies A Taxi Driver (2017) and 1987: When the Day Comes (2017) released in the same year have not only made a remarkable commercial success, but also gave impetus to thinking about how to ''re-historicize'' the South Korean history of the second half of the 20th century. With a deep concern for the ''de-historicization'' tendency latent in these two films in mind, this article undertakes the task of contextualizing the historicity of narratives of decolonization in East Asia and the Third World, in order to rethink the issue of subjectivity in such context. For this reason, this article tries to tackle the somewhat unfamiliar and ''precarious'' intellectual task of restructuring the genealogy of ''decolonialist'' thoughts in East Asia. By revisiting the regional landscape of the late-twentieth-century East Asia history of ideas, which was heavily influenced by Mao Zedong (1893-1976), Takeuchi Yoshimi (1910-1977), Mizoguchi Yuzo (1932-2010) and others, I try to reposition the ideas raised by South Korean thinker Park Hyun-Chae on nationalism, national economy and social characteristics, in order for us to better utilize these intellectual legacies to formulate new research questions, and to better understand and overcome the intellectual crisis of South Korea in the 21st century