英文摘要 |
To unify the individual state laws on animal protection and animal keeping, the Austrian Federal Act on the protection of animals (Animal Protection Act–TSchG) has been in force since 1 January 2005, and in the meantime, according to Federal Preemption Rules, this law overrides the animal protection acts of the Federal Provinces. Although the law enforcement is later than other European countries’, considering the content, including scope of application, competent authority, animal classification, definition of keeper, keepers duties, registration of dogs, constitutive elements (Tatbestand) and legal effects of animal cruelty, the Animal Protection Act is still of great value to Taiwan’s Animal Protection Act. First, It is not only because that its national-land circumstances (mountainous and agriculture-based) similar to that of Taiwan, but because the Austrian Animal Protection Act is an integration of individual state laws on animal protection to meet the management needs, so it has an advanced legal system and enforceable legal rules, which are the elements that Taiwan’s Animal Protection Act lacks. Second, the Act applies to all animals, including wild animals, laboratory animals, domestic animals (pets), and recreational animals (animals in a circus, variety show and similar facilities). In addition, the complementary ordinances for the management of animal sales, slaughterhouses, animal shelters, administrative execution and administration assistance are enacted in detail. In the end, the Act also provides the guidelines for animal protection ombudsmen and animal protection report, which is deficient in our legal system. Thus, by reviewing the the Austrian Animal Protection Act, this article aims to provide suggestions for the introduction of the animal protection report and amendments of our Animal Protection Act. |