| 英文摘要 |
This essay discusses how neo-conservatism shaped and influenced America's foreign and security policy, especially toward Southeast Asia. First, this essay defines neo-conservatism, analyzes the policy options of neo-conservatives, and argues that in recent years neo-conservatism has turned out to be prominent in the realm of foreign policy, and its adherents have gradually tried to influence American foreign and security policy by more aggressive proposals. Second, this essay explores the impact of neo-conservatism on America's foreign and security policy. Owing to the 9/11 incident, neo-conservatives have induced the American government to endorse Israel and oppose the Islamic regimes that do not get along well with Israel. As a result, there comes an impression that neo-conservatives had ''occupied'' the decision-making circle of American foreign and security policy. The way George W. Bush and Dick Cheney interacted with key neo-conservatives should be something like mutual back-scratching. At last, this essay evaluates America's Southeast Asian foreign and security policy under the influence of neo-conservatism. Despite the Bush administration's hope to enhance the practices of such a policy, it still fails to persuade major Southeast Asian countries - particularly Indonesia and Malaysia with a number of Islamic communities - to fully collaborate, largely because of the negative notion of America's Southeast Asian foreign and security policy resulting from: neo-conservatives' antagonism toward the PRC and Russia, wishful thinking about the promotion of American democracy to the rest of the world, strong support for Israel, as well as insistence on the annihilation of global militant Islam for the removal of threats of terrorism. |