公私協力計畫用地徵收取得之法容許性──以公益要件為中心

A Study on Legal Admissibility of Expropriation Regarding the Land Required for the Public-Private Partnership： Focusing on Public Interest Requirement

我國公私協力法制及實務慣常將公共建設本體事業以外，為達改善區域經濟結構、創造就業機會、帶動地方發展等附帶效益，亦將旨在追求營收之「商業設施」納入整體計畫中，形成「公共建設」與「商業設施」併存之複合型公私協力計畫。大眾捷運系統土地聯合開發及促參案件之附屬事業，即為適例。此等包含商業設施在內之公私協力計畫所需用地若採徵收方式取得，是否具有剝奪人民財產權所必要之憲法上正當性事由，不無疑慮。公私協力計畫用地中之商業設施，縱使可肯認具有促進土地資源有效利用之「間接」公益目的，但為符憲法保障人民財產權之旨趣，本文認為仍宜在個別之行政專法上，將其明定為得徵收之公益目的，並揭示此等徵收之公益目的應持續獲得確保之意旨。

In Taiwan, in order to achieve collateral benefits, such as improving reginal economy, increasing job opportunities, and promoting local development etc., our public-private partnership legal system and law practice tend to incorporate commercial facility into integrated project. Take joint development of land of mass rapid transit and subsidiary businesses in private participation in infrastructure projects for example, by combining infrastructure projects and commercial facility all together, this method has formed the so-called hybrid public-private partnership plan. However, since this kind of public-private partnership plan involves commercial facility, if the land required for the infrastructure project is obtained by expropriation, it will raise serious doubt about the existence of necessarily public interest when it comes to the deprivation the constitutional right of property. This paper argues that, with an aim of protecting constitutional right of property and ensure the existence of the public interest, although commercial facility in public-private partnership plan could promote effective use of land resources and achieve indirect public interest, the government should clearly stipulate the content of public interest, mechanism and measures regarding land expropriation in respective administrative law.