英文摘要 |
In the course of intervention into sexual assault cases, the medical social workers' engagement of the evidence collection and medical examination is a key part| medical social workers not only need to be familiar with the hospital internal process and act as the communication bridge between the physician and the victim, but also serve as a window of contact for the relevant departments other than the hospital| since every detail of the evidence collection and medical examination process bears on its quality and well-being of the client, medical social workers' professional practices of intervention into sexual assault cases are necessary. Up to now, however, the issue of medical social workers' engagement of the evidence collection and medical examination process has not been given due attention. In order to fill this gap, this study follows the paradigm of constructivism, adopts the methods of data collection and analysis from the grounded theory, invites six medical social workers who are working in the hospital and are mainly responsible for the emergency treatment to conduct semi-structured interviews, and then uses the strategy of collaborative analysis to enhance the rigor of the analysis, so as to deeply clarify medical social workers' practical experiences, setbacks and feasible solutions concerning the evidence collection and medical examination process. The results of this study are summarized into four themes, namely the clarification of medical social workers' engagement during the whole process, the role and task of medical social workers' engagement, the source of dilemma of medical social workers, and the reflection and expectation concerning the professionalism of medical social workers. The results of this study and the existing literature indicate that if medical social workers want to show their professionalism in the evidence collkeection and medical examination process of sexual assault cases, it is necessary to clearly define the connotation of medical social workers' engagement, and accordingly advocate the humanization-based evidence collection process of sexual assault cases, eliminating the departmentalism thinking among different professions. |