英文摘要 |
Objective: Clinical education can improve professional knowledge and skills, and ultimately improve the quality and efficiency of care. This study compared two training systems in terms of nursing competency and the clinical ladder.Methods: This study used a time series design in which posttest scores were measured in quasi-experimental groups (at different times). Newly employed nurses in 2005 served as the control group as they were trained using the old training system. Newly employed nurses in 2008 served as the experimental group as they were trained using a new training system.Results: The experimental group was significantly better than the control group on the seven indicators in the first year. In the second and third years, the seven indicators were significantly enhanced in both groups. When the second year was compared to the first year, the seven indicators were not significantly different between groups. When the third year was compared to the first year in terms of care skills, the experimental group had significantly lower scores than those of the control group. Based on the clinical ladder as a measure of provision of care, both groups improved in the second year but there was no significant difference between them. In the third year, scores in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group.Conclusions: Clinical education can improve nursing competency. A standardized curriculum and full-time, fixed, trained preceptors guiding clinical care can effectively enhance the clinical ladder. These results may be used as a reference for modifying the nursing training program in order to improve the quality of nursing care. |