英文摘要 |
The fire safety of long -term care institutions has always been an important issue of concern, since most of the people are vulnerable people, in the event of a fire, major deaths and injuries often occur. The fire safety issues of long-term care institutions have been often discussed, however few people have delved into the fire performance and suitability of various active fire protection systems. The aim of this study is to make a comprehensive comparison and analysis of different kinds of fire protection systems in order to make institutions understand system's pros and cons, so that in case of a fire, the fire protection systems would not only perform as expected but also significantly reduce the casualty rate. This research uses ''document analysis method'' and ''engineering practical experiences'' to explore and analyse the fire performance of various fire protection systems and make comprehensive comparisons between system features. Studies find that water mist has some advantages, including smoke scrubbing, better temperature control, faster response time, and lower water damage, etc, therefore vulnerable people would have more time for evacuation. As for the impact on residents' life in the installation, since water mist fire protection system has smaller pipe, lighter load and faster installation, which would not only greatly shorten the installation period, but also improve the safety level during installation. In summary, if the water mist system could become the compulsory system for the long-term care institutions in the near future, it is believed that this can significantly reduce the fire risk and casualty rate of long-term care institutions. |