英文摘要 |
This study analyzes the use of upgraders in the speech act of complaint in Hakka. Sixty Sixian(四縣) Hakka speakers were recruited to give responses to 18 complaint-provoking scenarios. We divide Hakka upgraders into three main categories, namely, intensifiers, aggressive interrogatives, and lexical intensifiers. Results suggest that Hakka speakers use more intensifiers and aggressive interrogatives than lexical intensifiers. Moreover, compare to female and senior speakers, male and junior speakers tend to use more upgraders to aggravate or strengthen a complaint by increasing its impact on the accused. Besides, Hakka speakers usually combine upgraders from different categories to further intensify the force of a complaint. According to our observation, though upgraders usually appear in direct or severe complaint strategies, they are sometimes considered minimizers and show up in indirect or gentle strategies. Lastly, unlike the speakers' choices of complaint strategies or downgraders which are greatly affected by complainees' social status and social distance, respectively, the selection of upgraders seem not to be influenced by those socio-pragmatic factors. |