英文摘要 |
The "non-use of force" principle established by the UN Charter is one of the most important developments in contemporary international law. Its core concept is mainly to promote peaceful settlement of international disputes. However, taking a look at the current situation of the international community, incidents of armed conflicts do not seem to have ceased. And the international issues derived concern a wide range of complexities and have become so significant that all countries have to tackle with caution and seriousness. When armed conflicts occur, it is crucial for the belligerents to decide legitimate objects of attack. This can be seen from the basic connotation of military objects and the principle of distinction. Judging by the historical development, the laws and regulations on military targets of land, naval and air warfare are different, and since the conclusion of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the two additional protocols of 1977, in addition to object distinction during armed conflicts, criteria are used as the basis for determining the objects of attack in military operations. Furthermore, important facilities such as levees, dams, as well as cultural property, religious facilities and medical facilities defined in international treaties must not be targeted and must be protected and respected in accordance with the law. The background of their establishment mainly came from humanism. In view of the multi-faceted nature of targets, this paper focuses on the distinction of the objects during armed conflicts, which will give us a deeper understanding of the relevant norms. |