英文摘要 |
Chiu et al. (2012) analyze the Chinese and English proverbs and find there are three kinds of fate beliefs: Fatalism, Negotiable fate, and Personal agency. Research also suggests that East Asians have a more holistic and complex thinking style than Americans, and take more information into account when making decisions. We propose that when Taiwan Chinese are primed with the Negotiable fate belief, more information will be included, especially in the exclusion condition. In study 1, participants were run individually and were primed with one of three fate beliefs. They were then asked to read a scenario that described an accident and told to include or exclude possible reasons for the accident. 125 participants were randomly assigned to a 3 (priming condition: fatalism vs. negotiable fate vs. personal agency) × 2 (choice set: inclusion condition vs. exclusion condition) × 3 (reason type: external-related vs. fate-related vs. personal-related) mixed design. Results showed that the size of the choice set was larger in the exclusion condition than in the inclusion condition. Also, participants who were primed with negotiable fate would take significantly more reason information into consideration in the exclusion condition than those who were primed with other two fate beliefs. In the study 2, 158 participants were asked to answer a set of scales, and found that the negotiable fate belief were positively correlated with holistic thinking and dialectic thinking styles. |