| 中文摘要 |
環境影響評估為近年從事許多開發案相當重要的行政程序之一，此一程序所要追求的程序正當性有賴參與來達成。然而，隨著環評制度所要關注的對象越趨多元，程序設計越趨嚴謹外，更可以發現近年程序中的參與者除了受開發案影響的當事人或利害關係人外，也包括許多非政府組織投入其中。究竟環評法如何看待非政府組織？非政府組織可以發揮什麼功能？非政府組織的參與是否更有助於追求環評決定的正當法？本文以正當法律程序及民主原則作為理論基礎，認為因應環境案件的特色，非政府組織參與環評程序可以兼顧公益及個人權利、事前預防及事後監督、公害污染及自然保育、跨國串聯發揮功能。從而，非政府組織的參與更有助於落實民主原則，並協助發現個案的問題、確保決策的正確性、追求行政效能。準此，必須在制度上針對不從型態的非政府組織給予在不同案件發揮功能的機會，有效率地將非政府組織引導到程序中，才能強化環評制度的制度能量，追求理性抉擇。
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is one of an importantadministration procedure during review development cases in recentyears. This institution pursues procedure legitimacy, and it depends oncitizen participation. However, EIA concern more and more values inits institution, procedure design is more rigorous. Not only litigantsand interested parties in each case participate in EIA procedure, butalso a lot of Non-government-organizations (NGOs) exercise in thisinstitution. Hoe EIA treats NGOs? Can NGOs exert what kind offunctions? Can NGOs' participation help EIA decisions pursuelegitimacy? This article analyses these questions by theories of “DueProcess of Law” and “Democracy Principle”. On order to responds thecharacteristics of environmental cases, this article concludes EIAinstitution can take into account a lot of dimensions, such as publicinterests and individuals' right, pre-prevention and post-supervision,pollutions and nature conservations, international cooperation, throughNGOs participate in EIA procedure. Therefore, we could implementdemocracy principle, find questions in each case, insure decisions arecorrect, and pursue administrative effectiveness from NGOs participatein EIA procedure. So this article concludes we should design differentNGO participation procedure for different type of development cases base on efficiency. Through the institution's guide, NGOs can exert its'functions, strength the capacity of institution. Finally, EIA can pursueration decisions really. |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
