| 中文摘要 |
今年（2019）公視推出電視劇《我們與惡的距離》，以無差別殺人事件為起點，串聯出不同立場關係者的故事。該劇也帶動了多項議題的探討，包含無差別殺人、廢除死刑、人權律師、精神障礙者以及媒體自律等，其中以「無差別殺人」討論度最高，媒體報導之下共產生了511篇討論文章，也帶出了修復式正義議題的探討。該劇也以重大犯罪事件之後，對受害者、加害人以及社區關係的恢復的角度討論修復式正義的議題。有鑑於此，筆者彙整各方觀點對上述相關議題的論述，期待從修復式正義的角度出發，探討：1.修復式正義的理論內涵要素、2.無差別殺人加害者可能犯案動機、3.無差別殺人案加害者選任辯護律師的必要性、4.法院對重大案件的判決對社會風氣的影響、5.社會大眾面對無差別殺人案件之後的創傷復原、6.應報式司法？修復式司法？兩者情感的拉扯，再回歸到7.修復式正義的諾許及所面臨的挑戰等，透過這7大面向的論述，期望能藉由該劇隊修復式正義獲得一些啟發性的思考。
This year (2019) Public Television launched the TV series ' The World Between Us ', starting with the indiscriminate killing incident, and connecting the stories of different positionalists. The drama also led to a number of issues, including indiscriminate killing, abolition of the death penalty, human rights lawyers, mentally handicapped and media self-discipline, among which the discussion of 'no difference killing' was the highest, and 511 discussions were produced under media reports. The article also brought out the discussion of the topic of restoration justice. The play also discusses the issue of restoration justice after the major crimes, from the perspective of the recovery of victims, perpetrators and community relations. In view of this, the author summarizes the views of the various parties on the above-mentioned related issues, and looks forward to the following aspects from the perspective of repairing justice: 1. The theoretical connotation elements of the restored justice, 2. The motives for the possibility of indiscriminate killing and perpetrators, 3. The necessity of selecting a defense lawyer for the indiscriminate homicide case, the impact of the court's judgment on the major case on the social atmosphere, 5. the trauma recovery of the society after the indiscriminate killing case, 6. the retributive justice? restorative justice? The emotional pull of both, and then return to 7. The repair of justice and the challenges In addition, through these seven aspects of the discussion, I hope to get some inspiring thinking through the repair of the team. |
本站僅提供期刊文獻檢索。
