中文摘要 |
1932年4月《臺灣新民報》發行日刊後面臨的新社會歷史現實,促使該報重新試探「臺灣人唯一的言論機關」的新航向。筆者關注焦點為左翼人士對「臺灣地方自治聯盟」溫和政治路線的批判,如何連帶形成一股反《新民報》及其文藝欄的勢力。本文擬以以「臺灣的菊池寬」為志向的作家賴慶(卒年不詳,生年推定為1902或1903年)為案例,指出在法西斯主義打壓下喪失行動力的抗日陣營左翼,以及退縮至地方自治運動的抗日陣營右翼,兩者路線之爭對日刊文藝欄走向造成的影響。賴慶暴起暴落的案例顯示,左的輿論不同於總督府檢閱、新興影音工業等外部挑戰,它從民族內部帶給《新民報》經營者及其作家脅迫感。透過「出土賴慶」,筆者將勾勒1930年代文藝誌與報紙文藝欄分化、《新民報》日刊向右轉進的一頁,並說明該報文藝欄如何在官方壓力和左的批判夾擊中,闢出臺灣大眾文學的最初園地?政治運動式微後的意識形態鬥爭如何退而以文壇為戰場,普羅作家對《新民報》文藝欄的不滿,又如何刺激文學場域的結盟與再分化?
After its publication as a daily newspaper in April, 1932, the new social and historical reality that Taiwan New People Newspaper faced at that time propelled it to seek the status as 'the only institute for Taiwanese opinions' in Taiwan. This paper focuses on how the mild political criticism from the Left on 'Taiwan Local Autonomy Association' was adopted as a force to fight against the Taiwan New People Newspaper and its literary column. By taking Lai Qing, a writer who desired to be the 'Kikuchi Kan in Taiwan,' as a case in point, this study aims to explore the transformation of the Japanese literary column caused by the conflict between the two forces in the nationalist movement at that time-namely, the Left which lost their mobility under the repression of Fascism and the Right which retreated into the local autonomy movement. The case of Lai Qing's sudden rise and decline shows that the Left's public opinions were different from those that came from the external challenges, such as the inspection from the Governor-General Office and the newly developed video industry. Instead of confronting these opinions outright, they threatened the operator and the writers of Taiwan New People Newspaper from the inside of the nation. By 'bringing Lai Qing back to live,' this paper seeks to foreground how the literary journals and the literary column in the newspaper in the 1930s parted their ways and look into the period when the Taiwan New People Newspaper took its right tum. In addition, the paper also tries to discuss the following issues: First, caught between the pressure from the officials and the criticism from the Left, how did the literary column in this newspaper open up a space for popular literature? Second, after the decline of the political movement, how did the ideological conflicts retreat into the literary circle and take it as its battlefield? Third, how did the popular writers' dissatisfaction with the literary column in the Taiwan New People Newspaper induce the cooperation and division in the literary field? |