高雄市員警對在職教育訓練認知研究－－以對外執法倫理認知衝突為例

The Cognitive Research on In-service Training of Kaohsiung City Police-an Example of Dilemma between Law-Enforcement and ethics

警察為公共領域守護角色，受人民付託，依法維護社會治安及公共服務，擁有大量的行政裁量權。唯目前仍受制於外在複雜環境因素，多以淺層的主觀現實（象）績效面為已足，甚少著力於更深層的個體本質之分析與化解，誠屬美中不足。然則，從分析高雄地區警察對外執法倫理衝突的困境作為問題切入點，進而導引出警政政策對在職教育訓練底線的反思。本研究嘗試以現行在職教育訓練課程規劃「媒體知識、執勤技能、價值認知、身心關懷」等，作為衡量在職教育訓練認知之決策參考變數，採用社會判斷理論（Social Judgment Theory, SJT）準實驗為研究方法。研究發現警察幹部及基層佐警仍存有認知歧異，為因應未來社會瞬息萬變，對兩者間所需開取的知識視窗，建議學習方式應做差異性策略規畫。"

Police, as the guardian of public domains, is authorized by the public with administrative discretion to ensure social safety and public service. However, restricted by exterior environmental factors, result-oriented consideration outweighs analysis of individual law enforcement officers. From analyzing the dilemma of code of ethics, the study induces the reflective thinking on police in-service training. The study tries to categorize the current in-service training courses into Media Communication Training, Tactical Training, Core Values and Mental health consultation. The four variances are viewed as decision-making reference cues in SJT model. The result shows that cognitive difference exists in command-level police officer and the low-ranking patrol police. The study suggests that learning content should be re-adjusted. Furthermore, to meet the rapid changes of future society, to respond to public's high expectation, the contingency of police education training is necessary.