試論明遺吳曰慎之史事易學

A History of the Ming Shen Yue Wu's left to learn

吳曰慎《周易本義爻徵》一書，《四庫全書》未收，上海古籍出版社《續修四庫全書》景有是書，並撰有提要，惟提要之說，乃就《周易本義爻徵》一書概述之，僅能得其約略輪廓，未能盡括全書之旨。近來有學者，對曰慎之生平、著作以及《周易折中》輯引吳曰慎易學述論、《周易本義爻徵》述論等部分，提出探討，論證《續修四庫提要》之非，然對於諸多疑點，如吳曰慎之易學淵源、吳曰慎易學與程、朱易學的關係等等諸般問題，皆未能詳加釐清。蓋吳曰慎生當明末清初之際，此時期亦為史事派易學著作，如金士升《易內傳》、葉矯然《易史參錄》、王夫之《周易外傳》等等紛紛成書之際。今欲研究明遺史事易學，乃至清代史事易學，則吳氏其人其書，乃不可不涉獵者也。本文在前人的研究基礎上，試圖對吳曰慎《周易本義爻徵》一書，作全面而深入的研究，透過形式與內容之分析、淵源與特色之歸納、價值與影響之統整，掌握其人其書之樣貌，並就《續修四庫全書提要》主要論點提出修正與補充，俾使明遺史事易學輪廓更加清晰，進而讓史事宗易學一脈更加完備。

Wu Yue Shen ''Book of the original meaning of Yao Zheng,'' a book, ''Si Ku Quan Shu'' uncollected, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House, ''continued Repair Sikuquanshu ''King There are books and essays have a feed, but the feed is said, is to'' excellent Yao Zheng, ''a book of Overview of the inferior, only lent roughly outline, including the book's purpose is not exhaustive. Recently, some scholars, Wu Yue Shen The biography, writings and ''Book of compromise,'' said Shen Yi Wu cited series Dynasty, ''Book of the original meaning of Yao sign'' Dynasty Other parts, made to explore, demonstrate not ''Continuation Four feeds'' and then for many doubts, such as Wu Yue Careful, learn all sorts of problems origin, Wu Yue and Cheng Shen Yi, Zhu learn relationships, etc., are unable to detail clarified. Shen Yue Wu Ming and Qing born when the occasion, this period also learn the history books faction, such as gold Shih Sheng ''Within easy pass, ''Ye Jiao Ran'' Yi shi '', Wang Fu-chih,'' Book of the rumor, ''and so have a book on the occasion.Ming left Jinyu study history to learn something, even something to learn the history of the Qing Dynasty, the Wu His book, is not not involve Hunting also. In this paper, on the basis of previous research, Wu said, trying to be careful, ''Book of the original meaning of Yao Zheng,'' a book, a comprehensive and in-depth research, through analysis of form and content, origin and characteristics of the induction, the value and integration influence, control the appearance and His Book, and on the ''Continuation Sikuquanshu Synopsis'' The main argument put a fool out of view, slight amendment and supplement a view to enabling next thing left to learn the history of the outline more clearly, then let history things to learn this veins were more complete.