英文摘要 |
The paper investigates the phrase ‘ba-ai’ assuming that a clause uses ‘ba-ai’ toplay the role of a conditional. When analyzed using Minami’s classification ofsubordinate phrases (1993), it was revealed that ‘ba-ai’, used as a conditional, works asan adjectival noun and belongs to the category B of the classification along withconditional expressing forms such as ‘to’, ‘ba’, ‘tara’ and ‘nara’. It was alsoelucidated that the conjunction is strong when ‘ba-ai’ and another conditionalexpressing form are used in the same text, that it divides into two distinctive structures;hyponymy and parallel. Hyponymy occurs when a principal clause depends on a clausewith conditional expressing form as well as when the clause with conditionalexpressing form further depends on a clause with ‘ba-ai’. Parallel occurs whensituations are simply listed.‘Ba-ai’ as a general conditional and as conditional expressing forms ‘to’ and ’ba’were also compared. The difference was demonstrated that ‘to’ and ‘ba’ are used toemphasize the dependency between situations while ‘ba-ai’ plays a role in suggestinghow the situation afterwards will happen. |