俄羅斯智慧財產權“入典”的歷史選擇

On the Historical Choice of the Codification of Russian Intellectual Property Law

現代俄羅斯法在法律類型上屬於大陸法系中羅馬──日爾曼法族之德國法分支，結構嚴謹、邏輯嚴密、包羅萬象的成文法典是立法者追求的終極目標，智慧財產權立法也不例外，將智慧財產權法納入民法典中統一規定是俄羅斯民 事立法的傳統。本文擬通過對俄羅斯智慧財產權立法法典化的歷史進程和立法背景的考察，以及對俄羅斯“四種方案”與中國“四種模式”的比較分析，試圖揭示俄羅斯智慧財產權立法與民法典編纂之間的內在聯繫和俄羅斯智慧財產權“入典”的外在動因，從而為我國智慧財產權立法模式的選擇和民法典編纂提供有益的借鑒。

According to types of law, modern Russian law belongs to the German law branch of the Romano and Germanic legal family in civil law system. A code of written law with rigorous structures, strict logic and inclusiveness is the ultimate goal for the lawmakers to pursue. And there is no exception for intellectual property legislation. It is a tradition for Russian civil legislation to incorporate intellectual property law into civil code with an view to unifying provisions. By reviewing the historical progress and legislation background of the codification of Russian intellectual property legislation and comparing and analyzing Russian 'Four Solutions' and Chinese 'Four Patterns', the article aims to figure out the internal relations between Russian intellectual property legislation and civil code compilation as well as the external reasons for the codification of Russian intellectual property, hoping to provide China with a good reference for the choice of intellectual property legislation mode and civil code compilation.