英文摘要 |
The prevention of misjudged cases has become a common consensus in criminal procedural legislation and judicial practice of all countries in modern times. The key cause of criminal misjudged cases lies in the evidentiary matters, namely many misjudged cases begin with violating and ignoring the evidence-governing principle and related evidentiary rules in the criminal proceedings. This paper is based on 30 typical criminal misjudged cases on a national scale as its research sample, all of which had been given judgments of acquittal. It conducts the quantitative analysis of evidence, identifies the intrinsic formation mechanism of criminal misjudged cases and proposes the measures for preventing such misjudgment. In addition, it argues to break the traditional notion of 'investigation centrism', to actively develop a 'trial-centred litigation system' and to regulate relevant evidentiary rules and systems in the light of the evidence-governing principle in the criminal procedure for the purpose of advancing the normalized, systematic and substantiated prevention mechanism of misjudged cases in China. |