視頻分享網站著作權間接侵權的過錯認定

Video Sharing Sites, Fault Identification in Indirect Copyright Infringement

在兼顧技術的自然屬性和社會屬性的“技術價值論”視野下，視頻分享網站在著作權間接侵權中的過錯可分為“故意”和“過失”兩種形態。而作為過失認定的客觀標準，注意義務在性質上系安全保障義務在網絡空間的自然延伸，以侵權結果預見義務為視頻分享網站注意義務的主要內容，並強調依據不同行為對象設置不同程度的注意義務。對於過錯責任形式，由於視頻分享網站在承擔補充責任後面臨追償成本過高的困境，形式上的連帶責任異化為加重的自己責任，而根據視頻分享網站的過錯和與損害結果之間的原因力，按份責任能夠避免視頻分享網站承擔過重責任，在公平原則的基礎上合理分配損害賠償不能的風險。

Under the guidance of “technical value theory” taking both the natural attributes and social at­tributes of technology into consideration, the fault in indirect infringement of copyright by the video sharing websites include two forms of “intentional” and “negligence”. As an objective criterion of negligence, the duty of care is the natural extension of security obligation in cyberspace, the foreseeable obligation of infringement results is the main content of duty of care for the video sharing website, and emphasizing that the degree of at­tention obligation is different from different behavior objects. For the liability form of fault, the video sharing website faces the difficulties of too much cost in debt recovery after taking the supplementary liability, the joint liability in form is alienated into aggravating its own responsibility. According to the causal link between the fault of the video sharing website and infringement result, the several liability could avoid overburden of the video sharing websites, and it should distribute the risks of not getting enough compensation based on the prin­ciple of fairness.