英文摘要 |
This research aims to explore whether the level of accounting conservatism could impact the salary system designed by the principal in addition to compensating the gaps in existing theoretical models. This research tries to establish a continuous model to measure whether there is a need to design different salary systems under different conservatism levels. The model adopted in this research are set upon three different accounting policies and the findings of this research reveal that: First, the higher the level of accounting conservatism in addition to “non-salary system” then the harder the agent works the higher the performance salary ratio prescription would be. Moreover, when the accounting conservatism exceeds the threshold, the impact from accounting conservatism to the agent's effort would multiply as well. The higher the level of accounting conservatism in “salary system” with fixed agent effort level and performance salary ratio, then we would discover higher fixed salary level. Second, while implementing neutral accounting, the effort level and performance salary ratio for the principal at “non-salary system” would be half of that at “salary system” in addition that the fixed salary would be in the negative column when in “salary system”. Third, the higher the liberal accounting in “non-salary system” whereas in “non-salary system”, while implementing liberal accounting, then the lesser the agent would work and the lower the prescription for performance salary ratio; hence if there is excessive liberal accounting and this could result with a non-equilibrium solution. Thereby the higher the liberal accounting in “salary system” with fixed effort level and performance salary ratio, then the lower the fixed salary would be. This research intends to provide as references for the governing authorities in prescribing the optimum salary and compensation so as to reach the balanced interests to lower the agency cost. |