英文摘要 |
This pragmatic study aims to find out the English refusal strategies most commonly used to respond to requests and offers by a group of Taiwanese EFL learners. It also investigates how these learners adopt different strategies in response to power variations. Twenty Taiwanese EFL students, from an Institute of Technology in Northern Taiwan participated in this case study. A background questionnaire and a discourse completion test (DCT) were used for the collection of the refusal data. The refusal responses were analyzed by semantic formulas developed by Beebe et al. (1990). The results show that participants in this study tend to employ indirect refusal strategies, with specific explanations for different eliciting speech acts of requests and offers and to interlocutors of different status. They believe the more specific justifications are offered, the more likely they can be excused and the tension can thus be lessened for this face-threatening act of refusal. Subjects also demonstrate their capability in using adjuncts (e.g., ”Thanks;” ”I really appreciate your invitation…”) as refusal strategies, particularly in response to the eliciting act of offers. Findings regarding other features of their preferred semantic formulas in refusals and the pedagogical implication of the current study will also be discussed. |