英文摘要 |
The conquest of Manila in 1571 by the Spaniards brought Spain closer to Asia at a time when the influx of American silver into the region enhanced the importance of Manila's economic situation. The union of the kingdoms of Spain and Portugal under Philip II (Felipe II, 1556-1598) in 1580 inaugurated trading operations between Macao and Manila as well as the navigation route between Portuguese India and Manila. By the late seventeenth century, the trade network between India and Manila, which had been dominated by the Portuguese, was gradually taken over by Muslim and Armenian traders. This change is documented in Manila's seventeenth-century Spanish customs records and account books. How many shipping routes and vessels existed in the seventeenth-century trade between South Asia and Manila? What varieties of goods and consumption demands were in Manila's trade with South Asia? This article attempts to answer these questions by examining seventeenth-century Spanish manuscripts. By analyzing the records and official account books at the Manila Customs House, we made the following three finding : (1) before 1640, most of the ships that set sail to Manila came from Portuguese India's Goa, Cochin, and Negapatan the Coromandel Coast. These ships were in the hands of the Portuguese. Apart from selling slaves in Manila, the Portugue e also bought Indian goods and weapons in order to re-sell them to the Spaniards. These goods were used in the many expeditions and conquests made by the Spanish military in the Philippines; (2) between 1640 and 1670, following the Portuguese separation from Spain and the occupation of Malacca by the Dutch, the South Asian-Manila trade stagnated; (3) in the late 1670s, the South Asia-Manila trade revived. In the 1680s, large quantities of Indian textiles were dumped in Manila, especially cambaya and Elephant cloth. By then, ships mostly came from the Coromandel Coast, especially from the ports of Madrastapatan and Portonobo. Some others came from Surate. The route from the Coromandel Coast to Manila was controlled by the Armenians, whereas the route from Surate to Manila was controlled by the Moors. |