英文摘要 |
In October of 1741, David Garrick, a 24-year-old wine merchant, made his debut as King Richard the Third at an unlicensed theatre in the suburbs of London. He instantly caused a sensation and became famous overnight with his innovative acting style. Described as “natural,” Garrick’s acting was often considered revolutionary, overthrowing the old school of rhetorical acting, as represented by James Quin. Afterwards, Garrick successfully claimed the London stage for over 30 years and created what theatre historians call “the age of Garrick.” However, it remains to ask: what was natural acting in 18th century London? Whether acting is natural depends on the taste of the audience or the conventions of theatre appreciation; then when did London theatre-goers start to consider rhetorical acting outdated and how did their taste get changed? How did Garrick learn the craft of acting before his debut? Theatre aimed to hold a mirror up to nature, so what did “nature” refer to? This article attempts to answer these questions by examining theatre criticism in newspapers, published acting manuals or treaties, and biographies in 18th century London. It explores the context in which Garrick’s new style of acting became acceptable, sums up the characteristics or contents of his natural acting, and explains the theories related to what count as “nature.” |