英文摘要 |
Shakespeare, the master of Western drama, never seems to care to conceal the idea of “playing” in his theatrical works. In Shakespeare’s most well-known plays such as Hamlet, The Tempest, and A Midsummer Night’s Dream, two or more dramatic frames are often seen to be contained within one single play. Although the concept of “meta-drama” had not taken shape in Shakespeare’s times, spectacular “metacharacter” (multiple role-playing), play–within-a-play, and intertextual juxtaposition of the theatrical circle and real life were already seen in his early original scripts. Those mentioned qualities pioneered the techniques of “meta-cinema” rendition of Shakespearean drama employed by directors in the twentieth century. Shakespeare often incorporates the concepts “life is like a play” and “the world is a stage” into his works, which endow Shakespearean screen plays with a tremendous potential for meta-cinema. During the 1940s to 2000s, there were over a thousand cinematic adaptations of Shakespeare’s plays around the globe, among which Looking for Richard, directed by Al Pacino in 1996, created a trailblazing category of Shakespearean cinema. Pacino expanded the partial meta-cinematic features of this play into the whole film, totally deconstructing the original text of Shakespeare, and turning it into a fleeting, next-to-nothing framework; the language was also extensively slashed and deconstructed layer by layer—ways to remind the audience that they are watching an artificially forged, made-up Shakespearean film. The cracks of the open ending leave the audience to unlimited exploration. The purpose of this paper is to analyze Al Pacino’s outstanding directing techniques in this Shakespearean film: how he radically adapted Shakespeare’s play from a “meta-” point of view, and how approaches like interrupted narration, diverging, and fragmentary editing were exercised to create obstacles for the audience in the viewing process and to prevent empathy. Moreover, the various meta-cinematic techniques like “frame-within-a-frame” in the film will be introduced in terms of how they produced a parallel and clash of two or more art forms to create an interesting inter-referencing effect, and yielded the function of meta-signifiers that reflexively allude to cinematic production itself. |