英文摘要 |
In his book, The Crisis of the Character in the Contemporary Theatre, Robert Abirached analyzes the creation and evolution of dramatic character in the West. He emphasizes the close relationship between the crisis of civilization and the evolution of character. If modern drama seems to make a major contribution to the revolution of character, it demonstrates just that the crisis of modern civilization is more complicated and more serious than before. The theatre of the absurd is one of the most important types of modern drama. What is its specialty in the creation of character? Most literary critics consider its characters as ‘flat.’ They use terms, such as “clown,” “puppet,” and “phantom” to qualify them. That is the reason characters of the theatre of the absurd are considered comic characters. But in fact the nature of the comic in the theatre of the absurd is very different from previous genres. This study aims to reveal this specialty. By revealing the depth and the multiple dimensions of the comic character, which used to be considered as simple, empty and mediocre, this work aims at filling a gap in related research. This study takes Ionesco’s play, The Chairs, and Beckett’s play, Endgame, as examples. The approach of the analysis includes three aspects: philosophy, psychology and esthetics. This is one way to prove that the reading of the characters of the theatre of the absurd is full of possibility, and to eliminate the confusion in understanding them. |