英文摘要 |
Using the TCRI (Taiwan the Corporate Credit Rating Index) of the Taiwan Economic Journal database as the proxy of credit rating, this paper empirically studies the arbitrage opportunities of 227 convertible bonds (CBs) listed in Taiwan GreTai securities market. This paper investigates the trading frequency of static arbitrage (or called convertible arbitrage), the shortest holding trading period of put provision arbitrage, and the required rate of return of investors, respectively. In addition, we further discuss the return distributions of the two CB arbitrage strategies with different credit risk profiles. From the empirical results, we demonstrate that for the lower credit risk profile (TCRI=2, 3, and 4), the Microelectronics CB with TCRI equal to 3 has the best performance in convertible arbitrage, Globe Unionindustrial CB with TCRI equal to 4 has the best performance in put provision arbitrage. For the moderate credit risk profile (TCRI=5 and 6), the Zenitron CB with TCRI equal to 5 has the best performance in convertible arbitrage, Wholetech CB with TCRI equal to 6 has the best performance in put provision arbitrage. For the higher credit risk profile (TCRI=7, 8, and 9), the Arima Optoelectronicsent CB with TCRI equal to 9 has the best performance in convertible arbitrage, Ampire CB with TCRI equal to 7 has the best performance in put provision arbitrage. From the multiple linerar regression, we domestrate that shortest holding trading period of put provision arbitrage is positively related with TCRI but negatively related with the corresponding stock index return, which means that the investors should enter into the put provision arbitrage when both the TCRI of the underlying asset of CB and the corresponding stock index are lower. |