英文摘要 |
The social conditions for developing Western aesthetics have been influenced by Christianity, leading to the formation of asceticism in the entire knowledge system. Even until the Age of Enlightenment, during which the confrontation between rational values and theology persisted, the society still did not abolish asceticism. Therefore, the resulting development of rational values had deliberately overlooked the aspects of bodily perception, causing the body to denote the contrary of the mind (rationality). Under this value system, the development of aesthetics had focused on rational values but neglected sensory perception. However, after an extensive process of secularization, the rationalistic monism of aesthetics can no longer elucidate the diverse development of arts in the current society. In the early nineteenth century, people began to reflect on the conventional rationalism. Amidst the trend of anti-rationalism, aesthetics placed increasing focus on the aspects of bodily perception. Ekber Faas adopted a genealogical approach to reexamine factors that cause the destruction of "somatic" concepts and values in the course of the knowledge system development. He reflected and revaluated related values, thereby deriving the properception theory of aesthetics. In an attempt to return to the original intention of which Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten established the concept of aesthetics, Richard Shusterman employed a method overturning the traditional philosophical knowledge system to develop somaesthetics, a "body-mind" interdisciplinary field. The aforementioned assertions show that contemporary aesthetics no longer disregards the aspects of bodily perception. This study investigated the transformation of social conditions to identify problems facing contemporary aesthetics, deliberating whether re-emphasizing the aspects of bodily functions enables creating a diverse aesthetics pathway that perceives the body and mind as a single unity. Accordingly, the influence of aesthetics on arts can be clarified. |