英文摘要 |
This paper is the analysis on the different borrowing logics in display amongst pledging transactions, formal finance, and relation finance. The unique thing about pledging transaction is the way of lending and borrowing by using ”object” as credit assurance, allowing the existence of personal credibility without any judgment on its accountability, as well as putting the social relationships behind the concealment of things, with a kind of social buffering function. By using object as credit assurance in the pledging transaction, it can immediately fill up what might be lack of in the daily lives of ordinary people, for which there is no assurance of institutions as credit as in formal finance, or no assurance of people as credit as in relation finance. As a result, this is the foundation why the pledging businesses can be in existence for a long period of time.Using the historical transition of pledges in the pawn markets as a kind of social observation, it can concretely illustrate the restrictions of lending and borrowing faced by the ordinary people under the circumstance of using object as credit assurance. During the process of ”object” becoming pledges, even though one can borrow money to cope with personal emergency, nowadays, as the life cycles of products are continuously being shortened, the product pricing is getting more and more fluctuated along the way. Thus, there is an amiss between product value in use and its value in exchange, whereas for the pledging transactions. They gradually transformed from consumer goods for daily life in the past into the collaterals on loans are ”show-off products” these days. For ordinary people who are used to take daily-life goods as pledge in the past, somewhere along the line they have gradually lost the ability to use object as credit assurance. |