英文摘要 |
The rapid transformation of economics and society in Taiwan had not merely led to de-memorize heritage spaces, but also increasingly made Taiwanese lose their valuable spaces of history. Because they present a historical development of cities, the heritage spaces always constituted as the declined area in the cities. In the growing disappearance of these heritage spaces, what has rescued in pepole mind is the illusive memories only. Recently, protection and reservation concepts for historical heritage have increasingly become imprortant, while the meaning of common memory space for pepole living and growing-up is well aware in the world. Because holding a heritage right has been considered as a personal right, people strat to feel that their heritage right has been deprived. Based on the governmental view of maintaining public benefits, the heritage interests belong to the public. It is for this reason that questions of 'who should own heritage right?' and 'is it fair?' are controversial. Approaches such as zoning system and transfer development right are used by many countries to sovle the heritage problems. However, most of them is considered on the basis of statute and methodology without any philosophy thinking about the heritage issues. Although these approaches are also used by many scholars of Taiwan, is it appropriate for Taiwan's environment? In order to clarify these complex problems and who should own the heritage right, the paper begins with the identification of heritage meaning to explore the historical meaning of property right and land ownership, and the equity. The heritage issues in Taiwan are examined and their policy implications for further research are proposed. |