五四新文化運動的異聲／和聲？－－重探《學衡》與新文化運動

Oppositional or Complementary?: The Critical Review and the New Cultural Movement

我們對於五四新文化運動的理解，在相當大的幅面上其實是繼承了五四《新青年》雜誌為中心的言談而形成的五四傳統、「五四論述」。這幾年來，在「重寫文學史」的風氣下影響下，對於在五四時期所發生的種種事件以及所形成的論述（新文化運動、文學革命、「文化保守」等）是否能依以往的認知來理解，還是需要重新加以評估，已成為我們今天回顧省思新文化運動的重要議題。本文嘗試在眾多研究成果基礎上，再回頭省思《學衡》與新文化運動之關係，希望在五四新文化運動的百年後，能從思想史發展的脈絡裡，重新思索評估其本質及意涵。

Our understanding of New Cultural Movement has largely inherited the discourse created and handed down to us from the May Fourth generation, especially those of the New Youth magazine intellectuals. Recently a new trend of re-thinking and re-writing literary history has urged us to reconsider what happened in that period and its possible alterative meaning. A new perspective thus created has asked for new revaluation of the significance of New Cultural Movement. This article attempts to look into the interrelation between The Critical Review and New Cultural Movement, and reconsider the essence and significance of New Cultural Movement.