英文摘要 |
The maintenance of health and continuum of care for all are importantissues in the aging society, however, the indigenous people are morelikely to encounter disadvantageous health, economic and geographicstatuses resulting in heavier long-term care needs and caregiving burdencompared with the people in mainstream society. In the current longtermcare system in Taiwan, care managers may be given professionaland official roles, however, they may simultaneously face a limitation ofjob stability. The purposes of this study are as follow: First, to explore thechallenges and working situations of the care managers when providinglong-term care services for the indigenous population. Secondly, topropose constructive suggestions on policy and practice in order to develop better long-term care services as well as social welfare servicesfor the indigenous population. The methodology this study adopted wasqualitative approach. A total of ten care managers from two countieswere invited to participate in one focus group and 6 individual in-depthinterviews. The results of the study found that care assessment andthe assessment tool did not consider the cultural characteristics of theindigenous population; many indigenous users could not afford the costof institutionalized care or the co-payment of the care plan designedfor them. On the long-term care delivery system, the vast geographicarea to cover for the indigenous population limited community-basedcare and transportation, thus making home-based care more doable.However, finding enough human resources and care workers to providehome-based care was a challenge. Based on the research findings, foursuggestions were proposed. First, the care assessment and evaluationtools need to be culturally sensitive which fit indigenous lifestyle.Secondly, the care managers should take the role of authority while theywere given responsibilities. Thirdly, the long-term care services could beprovided more flexibly that the indigenous people who were economicdisadvantageous could be benefited. Fourthly, the government could takea pro-active role and invest more resources to establish a comprehensiveservice system for long-term care. |