「意識之經驗底科學」之對象問題：《精神現象學》〈導論〉部分第十段之現象學性詮釋

A Problematic of Object in “the Science of the Experience of Consciousness”: A phenomenological Interpretation of §10 from Hegel’s “Introduction” in Phenomenology of Spirit

《精神現象學》之〈導論〉意識之經驗底科學實為導入「意識之經驗底科學」的導論。第九段至第十七段之部分主要在介紹對意識底辯證性經驗底研究基源問題，其基本解決構思、其解析之後設概念性模式、其生成性結構乃至其闡論整體架構。本文聚焦處理第十段部分，亦即以「意識之經驗底科學」之對象問題為主題，特別是專注關於意識之基本結構部分。第九段首先指出「自行顯現的知識之闡述」或「意識底經驗之科學」作為正在出現之科學同為檢驗者與被檢驗者之矛盾。第十段則指出其解決問題之基本構想：此科學之客體、亦即意識結構之為其對意識本身、知識與真理之區別與關涉結構正能解除前矛盾。

The “introduction” is the introduction to “the science of the experience of consciousness.” The part from §9 to §17 introduces the original problem and the theory of the dialectical experience of consciousness, which initiates from that problem. They comprise the basic conception of it’s resolution, the meta-conceptual model of analysis of consciousness- phenomenon, the genetic-dynamical structure of dialectical experience of consciousness and the framework of the whole exposition. This essay focuses on §10, i.e. the topic about problematic of object in “the Science of the Experience of Consciousness,” especially concentrating on the basic structure of consciousness. Paragraph 9 indicates the paradox of “the exposition of the self-appearing knowledge” or “the science of the experience of consciousness” as the appearing science, which is the examiner and at the same time the examinee. Paragraph 10 explains the basic conception of solution of this paradox. It is that the object of this science, the structure of consciousness as the differentiation and the relation of the consciousness itself, the knowledge and the truth can resolve the paradox.