英文摘要 |
This paper argues that, in the films of Canadian feminist filmmakers, Léa Pool and Patricia Rozema, the female/artist's flaneurial looks become strategies the characters and/or the films use to critique social power structure and/or construct women's or artists' identities. Marginalized in their society, the two directors' female/artist characters expand their own limited space through multiple spatial imaginary and practices. At the same time, they are flaneuses wandering in the city to capture images of urban architecture and people, and, at times, bird-eye's views of their cities. The urban fragments of their artistic 'sights' and imaginary scenes, taken from the female/artists' specific 'sites,' thus become either a form of self-expression or social interaction and critique. Added to the characters' urban views, the film directors also use their flaneurial camera to either speak for the characters or make implicit comments on the power relations they are involved in. A number of the two directors' films are used to address these interrelated issues. In discussing the artists' involvement with society, two examples are used: the artist's involvement in imperialist and capitalist system in Pool's Pool's A corp perdue (or Straight for the Heart), and the female artists' and entrapment in a society of male gaze in Rozema's White Room. In response to their sense of constraint, the artist characters construct (imaginary or textual) multiple space out of their limited space, which is shown in Pool's Anne Trister and Rozema's I've Heard the Mermaids Singing. Pool's A corp perdue, 'Rispondedemi,' La Femme de l'hotel, and Rozema's Mermaids and 'Six Gestures' are then used to analyze the different types of identity constructions through flaneuriallooks. Addressing the issues of feminine space and feminist flâneurial looks, this paper positions itself m the intersection of two controversies in the discourses on the flâneur: those of gender in/difference and flâneur as artist or as consumer. Through my discussion of the two directors' films, I argue that urban views in their films as well as in contemporary society do have gender differences, and that the artist flâneuses, though not consumers, cannot separate themselves from their society. |