英文摘要 |
The suppression of Formosa magazine was an unavoidable consequence, although its happening on December 10, 1979 was a contingent rather than a necessary development. Going beyond popular intentional explanations and the antimony of structure and process, this paper explains this suppression by analyzing the dialectic of structure and process with a long-term view. When in 1978 the KMT postponed the election without a definite deadline for its restoration, the opposition camp, dangwai, which had won steadily expanding support since its formation in 1975, became very frustrated and angry. Consequently, dangwai perceived the arrest of Deng-fa Yu as a signal of total suppression. For self-protection, the group adopted the 'radical' response of demonstration, which succeeded by using the difference between interaction and society. Mass mobilization then became a possible action option and changed the structure of the political system. The KMT's inaction led dangwai to believe in its own power, and its members were attracted by the reality of nonsuppression that they themselves had produced. The conflict between the KMT and dangwai then escalated because the KMT would not agree to restore the election and dangwai willingly embraced the new arena of the streets. When the 'symbolic' use of power could not deter dangwai and its supporters, the KMT could not help suppressing with the direct use of physical violence, in order to assure the populace to believe its power, as well as to guard the regime's stability. |