競技體育傷害行為的正當化根據及邊界

Proper Foundationand Boundary of Competitive Sports Act

規則範圍內的競技體育傷害行為欠缺不法性或者說具有正當性。至於其正當化根據，應綜合運用正當業務理論、危險接受理論（准同意說）和優越利益原理進行多維的闡釋和說明。對於違反競技體育規則造成嚴重傷害的行為，以往多是基於“司法不介入”的理念，交由體育行業內部自治。但行業自治不能排斥法律的適用，當違規競技體育行為造成嚴重的法益侵害後果時，刑法便有介入的必要。基於人身犯罪之規範保護目的，對於違反比賽規則致人重傷、死亡的以及惡意利用比賽規則傷害他人的，應依據行為人的主觀責任情狀，追究其刑責。

Injured actions of competitive sports, if conducted within rules, is lack of illegality or could be justified. Its proper foundation is the theory of justifiable business, acceptance of risk (quasi-consensus of the victim) and superior interests. As to the serious injury caused by violating the rules of competitive sports, it is usually handled according to the internal autonomy of sports industry, based on the idea of 'noninvolvement of judiciary'. However, internal autonomy should not reject the application of the law. When the lawbreaking behaviors cause serious infringement to the legal interests, it is necessary to apply The Criminal Law. According to the protective goal of the related regulations, when certain act violating the competition rules or using the rules for revenge or from spite to cause serious injury or death, the perpetrator shall take criminal responsibility in line with his subjectivity.