英文摘要 |
Empirical studies indicate that some basic features, such as: results ranking, the intemality and the extensiveness of the subject, diversity of assessment methods, mainly quantitative study, qualitative as complementary and the administration and limitation of procedure, showed in effective evaluating system of the criminal Law enforcement by the public security agency. The analysis from the effect level shows that the system can largely reveal the the issue of universality in criminal enforcement, which has considerable economicability and operability. But the weakness is purposely 'competition' evaluation, and lack of legalization in the overall degree. The formation of this system is under the background of comprehensively promoting the rule of law, with the requirement of strict enforcement of law and judicial justice; with the requirement of standardization and routing management in law enforcement in the digital age; with the requirement of the response to public demands in democracy and legislation age. In the long run, the system should transfer from 'competition' to 'legalization', that is the externalities of the subject, the scientization of evaluation indicators, and the materialization of evaluating problem. Due to the low level of scientization of evaluation indicators and the limitation of indicators' function, the system is not the sole criterion of evaluation, but it can be facilitated, which need combine with other methods to evaluate the effectiveness of the criminal law enforcement. |