生產、銷售假藥行為刑事違法性之評估

The Evaluation of Criminal Illegality for the Behavior of the Production and Sale of Counterfeit Drugs

取消生產、銷售假藥罪罪狀中“足以嚴重危害人體健康”只意味著對結果危險的否定，並不意味著對行為實質危險的否定。誤解的起源在於司法解釋觀從結果無價值→行為無價值→形式犯的立場退卻。從違法相對性理論來看，刑法中的實質危害性在定罪時必須要考慮，因為前置法基於其管制範圍以及處罰手段的特殊性，往往更注重違法的形式性。刑事違法判斷的相對獨立性決定了其必然不能回避實質危害性，實質危害性成為違法性判斷獨立於前置法的重要依據。在生產、銷售假藥的認定中，對於法律的遵循和解讀應當以滿足生存需要為前提。

Canceling the 'enough to harm human health' in the article of the Production and Sale of Counterfeit Drugs Crime just means the negative of the risk of the results rather than the negative of the risk of behavior. The origin of misunderstanding lies in the retreat of the concept of judicial interpretation, from 'consequential anti-value' to 'behavioral anti-value' to 'form crime'. From the view of relative illegality theory, the substantial damage in criminal law must be taken into account in the conviction, because the prelaw based on the scope of the control and the particularity of the punishment always more focus on the formal illegality. The relative independence of the judgment of criminal illegality decides that it can not avoid the evalument of substantial damage, substantial damage is an important basis for the independent judgment of the criminal law from other law. In the identification of this crime, the following and interpretation of the law should be based on the premise of meeting the needs of survival.