英文摘要 |
Du Jun (1611-1687), as a poet loyal to past-Ming dynasty , his poetic achievements are highly admired by Ming and Qing's scholars , however he is the annotator of Li Yu's fiction. Therefore, what's his viewpoint about fiction and why? What's the value of his viewpoint? These questions are worthy of studying. This study arranges his fiction viewpoints based on Du Jun's life and living surroundings to provide some referring angles for studying early-Qing's fiction viewpoints.
In the prologue, we inspect the period of his fiction annotation to explain his living and character by simple chronicles, these materials will be the basic resources in studying his fiction viewpoints. Next paragraph, the study discuss Dujun's viewpoints about fiction (as a literary form), even though he could accept the colloquial fiction, and approve its edifying effect, his viewpoint about fiction (as a literary form) is still obscure. He thought only the Edifyingfiction exist fairly, he couldn't agree the independent value of fiction (as a literary form).
Through three aspects of authors' creation viewpoints, works values and readers' aesthetic feeling, this study disserts Du Jun's functional fiction viewpoints. Du Jun's fiction viewpoints are based on edifying influences, however the definition of his edifying is not only moral discipline but the survive philosophy and living wisdom including. Thsi could be affected by the period of exchanged-dynasty and DuJun' personality in troubled times. As the author is concerned, Du pointed out the importance of gifted talent, and emphasize the eloquence. These viewpoints are also related to edifying effect. Du proposed the importance of colloquial humor language and resonable plots' design, he also used humor language to annotate fiction. Du mentioned the question of reading angles, reminded readers properly ' treated themselves as the actors in story', and he expressed the interaction between his fiction annotation and the text.
In a word, the poet Du's functional fiction viewpoint has the traditional limitation though. His viewpoint contributed an original innovation to the fiction theory development in Ming and Qing. We should treat him properly, couldn't make him absent in the history of Chinese fiction theory. |