純粹力動與絕對無：我與京都哲學的分途

Pure Activity and Absolute Nothingness: My way and its difference from Kyoto-School

文闡明筆者近來提出的「純粹力動」思想，與京都哲學與絕對無觀念做一對比，闡明我的「純粹力動」思想與京都學派的哲學的不同之處。分為下列各小節，加以展開：
一、關於京都哲學與絕對無觀念。
二、田邊元與武內義範的絕對無思想。
三、絕對無在慧能禪與久松禪的意義。
四、相而無相，無相而相。
五、禪的辯證。
六、終極真理與動感。
七、作為狀態的絕對無與作為活動的純粹力動。
八、無相的自我的問題。
九、由絕對無到純粹力動。

This article exposites my philosophy of Pure Activity and compares it with the philosophy of Absolute Nothingness of Kyoto School. “Absolute Nothingness” is the fundamental concept of the philosophy of Kyoto School. After my exposition of the different approach of “Absolute Nothingness” of Masao Abe, Keiji Nishitani, Shin' ichi Hisamatsu, Hajime Tanabe, I exposit my philosophy of Pure Activity in order to add a dynamic dimension of eastern philosophy and compare it with the non-substancial and negative philosophy of Absolute Nothingness”.