英文摘要 |
Zhu Xi epitomized the learning of the Song Dynasty in his work Collected Notes on Passages in the Four Books. an erudite work. From the Song to the Yuan Dynasty, many scholars offered elaborated comments on Zhu Xi's work; and the research on Collected Notes on Passages in the FourBooks became a major academic trend for many generations. Most historians of Chinese thought consider the Yuan Dynasty to be a flowermg period of Zhu Xi's thought. In fact, the reviews and critiques of Collected notes on Passages in the Four Books. have already appeared in the period from the late Song to the early Yuan, such as Wang Ruo-xu's Resolution of Perplexities in the Analects in the Jin Dynasty and Chen Tien-xiang's Resolution of Doubts in the Four Books among the outstanding examples. This author examines 91 passages in Wang Ruo-xu's work and 173 passages in Chen Tien-hsiang's, and discuss the differences and similarities of these two works. In view of Chen Tien-xiang as scholarly heir of Wang Ruo-xu, we also examine how the two men considered Zhu Xi's work to be 'overly abstruse', 'overly sublime', and 'overly generous'. Their methods of analyzing the Analects are : (1) To read between the lines. (2) To respect the words of the sages. (3) The Classics still contain uncertain passages await discussion. At a time when Zhu Xi's ideas dominated the official world of China, Wang and Chen published views contrary to Zhu Xi's were clearly an exceptional event worthy of our attention. |