乾嘉漢學視野中的杜注

Qianlong- and Jiaqing-era Han Learning View on Du Yu’s Commentary

晉代杜預的《春秋經傳集解》（杜注）是乾嘉漢學左傳學研究至關重要的基礎。乾嘉漢學專宗漢注，杜注因其所代表的晉代學風，與乾嘉學者提倡的學術規範、治經方法、注疏原則、學術追求以及學術趣味等方面存在衝突，而遭遇排斥，與此同時，杜注的文字訓詁經乾嘉漢學的補苴，更趨完善。通過考察乾嘉漢學視野中的杜注，可以看出清代乾嘉學術的特點與不足。

Du Yu’s 杜預 Jin dynasty 晉代 Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals 春秋經傳集解 was an extremely important foundation for studies of the Zuo Commentary 左傳 in the Han Learning 漢學 of the Qianlong 乾隆and Jiaqing 嘉慶 period. Han learning during this era was focused on the Han dynasty commentaries. Du Yu’s Commentary had been rejected due to the fact that the Jin dynasty scholarship it represented conflicted with the academic standards, ways of studying the Classics, commentarial principles, and academic pursuits and tastes that were being advocated by scholars. At the same time however, scholars improved upon the philology in the Commentary by filling in gaps and omissions. Through an examination of Du Yu’s Commentary as it was viewed by Qianlong- and Jiaqing-era Han learning, the characteristics and inadequacies of the scholarship of this period of the Qing dynasty 清代 can be seen.