土地分區使用管制得否阻礙時效取得地上權

Land zoning regulation was not impede the right prescription to superficies

憲法第15 條規定人民之生存權、工作權及財產權，應予保障，而此等財產權之保障，如必須加以限制時，另參照司法院大法官會議釋字第488 號解釋要旨，必須合於憲法第23 條所定必要程度，並以法律定之，其由立法機關明確授權行政機關以命令訂定者，須據以發布之命令符合立法意旨且未逾越授權範圍時，始為憲法之所許。

Article 15 of the Constitution of the People’s right to exist, the right to work and property that must be protected, if they be limited in case, another reference to the Council of Grand Justices of the Judicial Yuan Interpretation No.488 words to explain the gist of the Constitution fifteen of the People’s property rights should be protected. Restrictions on property rights of the people must be together in Article 23 of the Constitution stipulated the extent necessary and prescribed by law, which expressly authorized by the legislature to the executive command set are required to release, according to the command line with the legislative intent and did not go beyond when the mandate, only be allowed by the Constitution.